Friday, June 20, 2008

Style Guide: To Cuff or Not To Cuff

Recently, I had an interesting question posed to me by one of my readers. He had purchased a pair of pleated trousers at Brooks Brothers and it was recommended that he have them hemmed with cuffs.

His wife, who is German, objected to this approach and cited her and her European friends’ opinion that stylish men do not cuff their pants. In a quandary, he called up the store and talked to another associate who said that pleated trousers demand cuffs and that their added weight help the pant leg hang properly.

Unsure if this were the best advice, he contacted me. I understand the confusion because this tricky issue is one that’s both sartorial and personal. By that I mean the question of cuffing one’s trousers is partially based on a cultural perspective and partially on personal taste.

For starters, his wife is correct that in Europe cuffed trousers are less common. The fact that his wife is German certainly explains her dislike of cuffs. The German aesthetic, when it comes to function over form and elegant austerity over lively embellishment, is fairly well known.

Across Europe though, as with anywhere else, fashion preferences change. I purchased a pair of wonderful Incotex pants in Venice and had them tailored there as well. The salesman and tailor both recommended cuffs, the execution of which had some of the most beautiful finishing work I'd ever seen.



That these immensely stylish and opinionated Italians recommended cuffs caught me off guard because the plants were in fact, flat fronted. Flat front trousers are pretty much the rule in Europe and I began to think that to my reader’s wife, therein lay the real issue.

I suspect that she wants her husband to embrace a more Eurocentric wardrobe, sans the pleated trousers. Generally speaking, pleated trousers are more common in the United States than in Europe. The only caveat to this generalization is England, where you’ll still see pleats a little more often than elsewhere on the Continent. It's also still fairly normal to see pleats on both American and English suit pants. American preppy stalwart J. Press is the noted exception as they have never offered pleated suit pants.



Anyway, to get back to the original question; when it comes to tailoring, pleated trousers are best cuffed. The weight of the cuff will help the trouser leg hang and both physically and visually balance the peats up top. On flat front pants it's more of an option dictated by personal preference.

For example, my Incotex trousers are a very fine gray worsted and the cuff helps keep the lighter fabric from riding up my calf. Also, since Italians like their pants legs cut so darn high (barely touching the top of the shoe) you need that weight to keep them in place. Had wished to do so, it would have been perfectly acceptable to have gone with no cuff and have the hem cut longer.

So, here is where it all comes together: if you like pleated trousers, they really look best cuffed. If you're working with flat front trousers than it's more of a preference thing and either option is just fine. In the big picture, I will accede to those who say there is no rule and you should go with what you like. But at the ground level, pleated pants simply look better with cuffs and that is what I recommend.

Another way to look at it is from a cultural perspective. Pleated and cuffed trousers just look American, especially with the fuller cuts favored by American brands like Brook Brothers. That's not a bad thing, it's just a truth. How do you want to look; American or European?



Personally, I tend to like classic American casual clothing and European tailored clothing. When I go to Europe, I try to dress less American; not for any political or self-conscious reasons, I just enjoy the change.

My ultimate recommendation is always to go with what you like and what feels right, because in the end you're the one wearing the clothes. Still, as someone with a wife who has a killer eye for menswear, I never discount what she has to say.

11 comments:

  1. Anonymous9:51 PM

    The fact that his wife is German certainly explains her dislike of cuffs.

    It might also explain why she's so bossy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great post! Both are perfectly acceptable. Plain or pleated. Cuffed or uncuffed. The fact that stores currently stock more plain front pants right now in Europe is the garment industry's attempt to keep the market segment moving. Remember the arrival of the three button suit? You couldn't find a two button suit if your life depended on it anywhere in Europe or the U.S. Unless, of course, you have a tailor make your clothes. And that's where European elegance shines. Most European gentlemen who need to, or care to, or can afford to, use a tailor for most of their clothes. Even with Euro RTW, there is more tailoring, adjusting and modification to a garment to it make fit well. American stores offer very little and very poor service on this front. It’s too “manual”, and there aren’t many real tailors left in America that know how to make an RTW fit well cost effectively.

    Plain fronts can look very good on a relatively youthful slim frame. Worn at the natural waist you look taller and sleeker. If you have too much of a belly, you risk looking awkward. Pleated pants look good on both body types, but can have a slimming effect on the “office gut” when worn at the natural waist. Pleated tends to be the choice for most of the best dressed “gray-haired” industrialists throughout Europe. Cuffed, of course, and more fitting to flatter the body. The ridiculous width of the American trousers is U.S. RTW garment industry's way of making one size fits all for “large” Americans and save on costs. This is part of the reason why European gentlemen tend to dress better than most American men. The clothes just fit them better.

    I would just add that there is no single defining "European style" such as plain front vs. pleated trousers, just as there is really no single American style (dare I say except the poorly fitting khaki pants, white trainers and garish colored polo shirt combo that is called business casual). Even American Traditional has distinct regional variations.

    I'd say European men "tend" to know more about how to dress than Americans. They care more about it because dress still defines the social structure, or "where you come from". And less European men are willing to let a woman tell them how to dress!-German or not. Italian women break your balls just as much!

    Whereas in America this social structure is radically different, I'd say it's more like "where you are going".

    The once, truly elegant American style that was instantly recognized and even admired by many continental Europeans has evolved. I'd say into something like, "I dress like crap because I don't have time to think about clothes!" Besides dressing is for girls, if you look too good, you obviously have way too much time on your hands!

    Pity...JFK was a well dressed guy. And I think the American style held its own against any European look. American men need to learn how to dress better. Packaging is important. It shows you care about the other person. Letting your wife/girlfriend dress you is like handing over control of your life to her. She won’t respect you for it, and she’ll be checking out the sharply dressed European men on your next vacation. You’ll be thinking “Euro trash!”

    -- an American in Europe of half German half Italian origins going broke supporting the families of two tailors, one barber, and several bartenders.

    ReplyDelete
  3. CG - Thanks very much for the well composed comment. I especially appreciate your observation that in Europe, style and quality of dress may still speak about where you're from while in the states people are dressing more for where they want to be.

    You are also spot on when talking about regional variations in style. Though all Americans, you would never confuse a New Yorker for Bostonian let alone a Texan. The same holds true for Europeans, as you helpfully pointed out.

    Chris

    ReplyDelete
  4. But cuff take 2" off of your height, and make your legs look stumpy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Scott, depending on body shape and height, you're right. Every man has to see what works for them. For shorter guys, I'd say take a pass on the cuffs.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wonderful post, as usual.

    I prefer to cuff my suits with flat front trousers. I believe they hang better and give a more polished look. Chinos, which are far less formal, I tend to leave uncuffed. While I don't currently own any odd trousers with pleats, I always have cuffed them in the past. Beyond that, it has as much to do with the volume of the pant legs as anything.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Scott, I thought so too, years ago. Cuff widths can vary in accordance with height.

    I learned, however, what really creates or destroys the illusion of height is the "rise". Most RTW trousers are cut to be worn at the natural waist. But most men tend to wear them at their hips. This makes the crotch drop almost six inches. Your legs suddenly look far stumpier than they really are and you look short.

    A tailor told me that the crotch of your pants should almost touch your ..."friends"...that way your pants show the real length of your legs. Too low, and you lose height. I tried the higher waist, better fitting trousers, and it makes all the difference.

    Fit... it's funny. We never thought about it, but it makes the difference between being well dressed or looking like a clown.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I prefer cuffs on almost all my trousers, save jeans and a few moleskins. I think they provide a finished, 'completed' look to the trouser leg. It looks smarter, IMO.

    I prefer flat front for casual trousers and pleats on suits, although I have a few (4?) sack suits with flat fronts.

    Germans are known for their cultural sophistication and practical nature, so I don't know why this particular women hated cuffs so.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It is up to the individual and varying the cuff width is a great way to do it. What burns me is when the salesman tells me, as did a Nordstern type when I purchased Faconnable moleskins, that since they were flat front I must not do cuff.

    "Um Huh", I said. "Cuff 'em an inch and a half and I don't want a break." This seemed to annoy him to no end but we Trads must insist on what we want. Right or wrong. We're paying for it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. CG, great point about the rise issue. I have become pretty fixated about the rise of my pants too and it makes a big difference.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous2:55 PM

    Good Job! :)

    ReplyDelete