
While I am a big fan of the suit, it occurred to me that although a return to formality is now a general trend in many workplaces, the implied requirement of a suit is no longer the rule.
Suits are still very much a vital part of any man’s wardrobe, more so in this capitol city where the gray sack suit is as ubiquitous as a policy position. Nonetheless, the need for an actual suit to achieve the relative standard of “professional dress” is far less prominent than in the past. When did this happen?

Remember the heady dress down days of 1999? The Internet bubble was fast expanding and with it came the Californication of workplace clothing. Jeans, khakis and polo shirts replaced suits and ties. Office dress codes were turned on their heads, and frankly this sartorial purging was desperately needed. Prior to the Internet culture taking hold on both coasts, men's clothing for the workplace was in a bad place.
It may be hard to remember now, but most off the rack suits were boxy, ill fitted, identical, boring, and of poor quality. The suit itself had lost any real sense of occasion and been relegated to the role of anonymous uniform. A few bastions of classic loathing like Brooks Brothers and to a lesser degree, Jos.A. Banks, provided professionals with good quality suits. Other than that, the choices were widely divided. Either cheap mass produced articles devoid of character or even quality, or very high-end brands that were out of most working stiff's reach.
At the same time, most offices had established suits as the de riggur uniform for it's employees. What was missing of course was the ability to express personality or individual style; within corporate bounds of course. As the Internet culture took hold in all sorts of workplaces - because if it worked in California, of course, it should work everywhere else - workers starved for sartorial freedom embraced corporate casual to varying degrees.
After a while it dawned on many of us that, when you got down to brass tacks, the “movement” was really just a gambit that allowed college whiz kids to avoid doing the laundry now that they had jobs. By the time the internet revolution came crashing down in the latter half of 2001, the emerging need to appear professional and trustworthy helped claw back some workplace decorum. I mean, how confident would you be, faced with a bunch of angry antitrust layers, if you attorney walked in wearing ripped jeans, Chuck Taylors, and a College sweatshirt. Yes, there are some super archivers who wear whatever the hell they want, but the're earned that right. A 24 year-old just out of school has not.

So, here we are in the midst of what can be described as a legitimate menswear renaissance. Guys of all ages are now interested in dressing well and expressing their personas through clothing and high quality accessories. Not since the golden age of menswear of the 1930s has there been so much opportunity when it comes to what men can wear on a given day.
In today's world, the role of the suit is still very secure. Where once there were one or two chain stores at which to suit up, men now have numerous options from which to choose. Bespoke tailoring has enjoyed a sartorial resurgence and the whole idea of classic clothing is front and center.

This time however, suits are not alone. Separates like sports jackets and blazers paired with flannels and dress trousers have enjoyed renewed popularity as well. But the suit is still king, and for the first time in a long time pretty much every style is a go. From two to three buttons, single breasted to double, suits are back in the office and strolling the street.
I live in sweden and at my office the dresscode pretty much says we have to wear suits.
ReplyDeleteI have no problem with this, although I do feel a bit restricted in the ways I can express myself via my clothes.
Well anyway... Most people here, especially the older generation, wear suits with horrible fit, and they're mostly black or dark charcoal.
Some of the younger guys (I'm turning 24 myself) buy more modern cut suits from high end fashion brands, and they generally fit better, but almost everyone seems to lack knowledge of what a good tailor can do for a suit.
But every once in a while you can catch a glimpse of a few guys who really know what they're doing. The suits fit perfectly, and they take notice to details.
Spotting one of these few guys always makes my day.
Driving home through a trendy part of town the other day, I saw a well-dressed man. Yes, it's that rare, at least around here. While the suit may be back, I find it difficult to find men who will have them tailored properly, move away from the buttondown or the solid shirt, choose good ties, or buy decent shoes. Don't even get me started on pocket squares.
ReplyDeleteI can't wait for the city trend toward dressing up to trickle down to the provinces (like our beloved Richmond.)
I agree with both of you - more than just wearing a suit or not, fit and personal style are really what matter most.
ReplyDeleteI've seen plenty of men in apparently expensive suits that look like nothing more than potato sacks. And I've seen just as many stylish and professional guys in variations on the sports jacket/sweater and pants look.
The difference always seems to be fit, color, attitude and an understanding of their environment. Does what I have on work for where I am? Most men never seem to ask themselves that question and it shows.
Great post. But no one earns the 'right' to dress like a slob, no matter how many 'achievements' he has to his name. In my community, the rich (celebrities, lawyers, surgeons, real estate developers, etc.) generally dress like long-haired slobs and hippies. (There are exceptions, of course, but these are usually East Coast types or foreigners). At its most basic, dressing like a slob is a 'F*ck you!' gesture, and those of us who are aware of sartorial standards should treat it as such.
ReplyDelete